A tale of two insideout VR headsets The 400 Oculus Rift S 600 HP Reverb Ars Technica

Enlarge / The $600 HP Reverb (left) and $400 Oculus Rift S (proper).

By the give up of 2019, many essential VR headset manufacturers seem poised to release a new "announcement" product for PCs. This month sees two such headsets reach store cabinets: the Oculus Rift S (coming May 21, priced at $400) and the HP Reverb (out now, starting at $600).

In both businesses' cases, the declaration from every headset is a mixture of improve and compromise. Rift S sees Oculus take two steps forward, two steps lower back, from its three-12 months-antique Rift headset to establish a new "baseline" PC-VR enjoy, particularly with lively hand monitoring in thoughts. Meanwhile, Reverb targets to supply the most low-cost "high-res" VR headset ever made—which, as you may count on, consists of some imperfections, starting from the apparent to the unexpected.

After dwelling with both headsets, I can record that each headset's sales pitch is completely first-rate, no longer sport-changing, and each are really worth scrutinizing—because nor is currently a slam-dunk advice.

HP Reverb: You say you want resolution

• The fabric face of the HP Reverb is its exceptional design detail.
  Sam Machkovech
• Another look at that cloth front, and the way it runs right into the relaxation of the plastic frame. Also, you could see the downward perspective afforded to one of the Reverb's two front-going through sensors.
• However, the actual head-fit of the Reverb feels a chunk spartan, in particular way to this unwieldy match of headphones and facet straps.
• Oh, look! "VR Headset!" I've usually desired one of these.
• The Reverb in its box, with a pair of covered Windows Mixed Reality controllers. These are similar to with different WMR headsets, and they rely upon the sensors maintaining an eye at the controllers' very brilliant strip of LED lights.
• Reverb from the pinnacle. This is the $650 version, which enhancements the face lining to a extra relaxed leather alternative. (The general $600 version comes with a material lining.)
• The bottom of the Reverb, with a take a look at its plastic nasal relaxation. This angle does an awesome task displaying how the returned "halo" strap may suit well onto an average head. I'm keen on it.
• A peek at the lenses.
• HP includes a manner to detach the Reverb's cable with a clamp pretty close to the headset itself. This is an uncommon alternative for client VR headsets, however it is strong enough which you should not worry about yanking it off in case you step on a cord even as within VR.

Let's begin with the HP Reverb, a headset that guarantees to exceed the display screen first-class and pixel density of the already-incredible HTC Vive Pro and Samsung Odyssey. Reverb's overall resolution weighs in at a blended 4,320x2,160 across its fast-switching LCD panels.

As a end result, earlier than HP agreed to ship us a checking out unit, we have been asked to verify a pictures card minimal of a GTX 1080 or AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200. Notice that their latter proposal is designed for workstations, no longer client PCs. That's the factor. The Reverb is squarely targeted at an business enterprise or improvement use cases wherein display screen satisfactory is paramount; this isn't always your headset for gaming or excessive-velocity interactivity.

Weaker GPU?

If you want to on occasion join a high-res Reverb to a lower-than-endorsed GPU, we suppose that is OK. Our use of a notebook-grade GTX 1070 labored in a range of popular video games, but maximum of these routinely downgraded their resolution, anti-aliasing, or first rate-sampling settings. Some apps don't play as nicely, and looking to push "normal" settings in a visually wealthy recreation like Moss resulted within the form of frame charge stutters that we wouldn't dream of recommending. But if that sort of lower-powered PC is your only choice, we suggest extra warning.

This is first made apparent by using a clumsy headstrap. Unlike the springy flex of the authentic Oculus Rift or the rotary dial of the PlayStation VR, Reverb's strap is spartan. You get three velcro straps to adjust, which might be all tough to adjust while carrying the headset. This is all sure by way of a mild-yet-huge halo, meant to healthy towards the back of the pinnacle, and it comes with two decidedly reasonably-priced-feeling over-ear audio system—with fuzzy material you would assume from $5 airplane headphones. (You cannot detach these, however you could push them off your ears and plug to your personal headphones with a three.5mm jack.)

Yet this spartan method manner the strap gadget is underneath-engineered, a rarity inside the region. The headset is notably lighter in mass than the over-engineered Vive Pro, which can be well worth a few inconvenience. Its back-halo layout continues greater weight off your face than the original Rift. Plus, healthy it onto your precise head shape once, and it is simple sufficient to place on and take off from there.

The Reverb's turn-up functionality is flimsy and bumps into your head, so it disappoints as a "peek at the outside world" alternative. Its cramped indoors isn't always specially glasses-pleasant. And in case your interpupillary distance (IPD) measures outside the "common" measure of 61-66mm, Reverb's "virtual IPD" adjustment option will depart you unhappy from a consolation degree.

All of that's to say: If your anticipated enterprise/enterprise use case consists of typically VR-savvy experts of a perfect head shape and length, you'll be fine. If you're handing these to an expansion of utter VR learners, however, be prepared to on-board them just to get the aspect on.

Sweet spot, now not-so-candy result

As for the Reverb's displays, the pixel resolution of four,320x2,160 is top notch for the sector, properly beyond the two,800x1,600 degree of the Vive Pro and Odyssey. (And it is even more than the Rift S, which we'll get to.)

Reverb's "sweet spot" visibility, inside the middle of a person's field of imaginative and prescient (FOV), is absolutely the winner in its rate quarter. After more or less one week of Reverb testing, I'm now convinced that this is the pixel depend to count as "properly sufficient" if you want to guarantee unobtrusive small-text legibility for the sake of VR's research, training, and industrial design apps. (In Reverb's case, this promoting factor is buoyed by using the LCD panels' dense subpixel decision and 90Hz refresh.)

HP provided some sample "professional" apps in the course of my trying out duration, and after wandering through a digital replica of Helsinki and dissecting a frog in a school room, I understood why. With my attention focused on the front-and-center content material, I ought to see the Reverb's sales pitch damned surely. HP has crossed an vital VR-quality line at a reasonable enterprise charge point in 2019, and the relaxation of this review's caveats and warnings cannot erase that fact.

One of those caveats, but, is my use of "candy spot" as a qualifier. I struggled to recognize why the high-res panel, all-in-all, seemed a piece smeary ("a piece" is not a totally scientific descriptor, in spite of everything). That trouble have become clearer as soon as I set up a "VR desk" of a headset, a single hand-managed WMR controller, a bodily keyboard, and a floating VR replica of my PC's 2D computing device.

Doing this confirmed my suspicions: the HP Reverb, like many different VR headsets, offers a clear view in its principal FOV but is less successful at translating its peripheral pixels. Trying to study text within the periphery was a warfare in comparison to the equal text performing the front-and-middle. This was specially clean to note as I examined details unfold across 16:9-ratio laptop windows and Web browsers. Without a physical IPD slider to work with, and most effective a "digital" IPD adjustment alternative, I had no concept how to treatment this obvious blurriness. Countless tries to re-healthy the headset did not help.

To be honest, the fact that I should comfortably study Windows computing device content material is its personal VR revelation. That's nearly impossible to simply do on the primary wave of2019 VR headsets. But the Reverb's arrangement of pixels and lenses does no favors to peripheral-view content, which ends up in an uncanny valley-like issue: once a number of the content is so damned crisp, why cannot all of it be? Additionally, why have to the headset be so annoying of PC hardware if it blurs its peripheral pixels by using default?

Some headset producers are toying with foveated rendering, which reduces pixel decision relying on what is being displayed or how a consumer's eyes are tracked. But not anything so efficient is happening right here. The Reverb as a substitute renders, then wastes, at least one fourth of its pixels, which I can inform via budging the headset awkwardly round till only its nook pixels come to be clean.

LCD concerns

That divide in readability way all of the comfort you might hope for from a higher-res headset dwindles in longer-time period use. This is a shame because the short-switching LCD panel lives up to a 90Hz refresh with fuller subpixel decision than similar OLED panels. However, the "halo" impact from its fresnel lenses is particularly noticeable within this headset.

Additionally, HP's choice of rapid-switching LCD panels way the Reverb honestly suffers from imprecise shade calibration—at least, compared to the rich, RGB-ideal results you could assume from a calibrated OLED panel. Part of that Vive Pro $1,100 fee tag is an knowledge that something content material you carry in will enjoy nearly uniform colour replica. But the Reverb's "cold" blue-inexperienced wash, which is nigh indiscernible while looking at a preferred CMYK colour sheet, becomes obvious across a much broader scene, mainly the pastoral, fake-outside environs of the hub areas in Windows Mixed Reality and SteamVR.

In VR stories that depend upon moody color mapping (like the storybook-adventure of Moss), the colour replica borders on tricky. Everything in that game looks darker and less alive than on the OLED-fueled HTC Vive Pro. A visible "mura" impact on our checking out headsets led to choppy color reproduction across extensive fields of pixels, as nicely. It changed into arguably the maximum excessive mura effect I've ever visible on a consumer-grade VR headset, in fact. (To excellent provide an explanation for this, think of a big website history shade, which is supposed to be absolutely uniform, having an uneven smudginess to it. Next, imagine that smudginess shifting in relation to wherein your head is aimed in VR.)

The normal Windows Mixed Reality caveat

If you are quality with relatively imprecise colour replica, high device needs, and an asterisk on Reverb's high resolution, you have got one more tablet to swallow: its simply ok room-monitoring powers. This is equal to most inner-out Windows Mixed Reality headsets, which depend on two forward-facing cameras and assure decent monitoring, so long as you keep your hands normally in front of your face.

The brief model: milder apps like TiltBrush and Vacation Simulator work simply nice. (So did the academic apps that HP furnished.) Highly lively apps like Beat Saber and Space Pirate Trainer, on the other hand, must atone for Reverb's poorly tracked palms on a pretty normal basis—as in, each 45 seconds in a high-speed Beat Saber song, a hand will especially disappear for a moment. Meanwhile, any games that depend upon above- and at the back of-the-head hand motion are out the window, as maximum WMR headsets (which includes the Reverb) don't have upward-going through tracking sensors.

In top news, most famous VR fare expects lighter tracking, and as a end result, WMR-style tracking will paintings in a pinch. But if the concept of randomly disappearing hands is too VR-breaking for you, then you may need to pony up for a fuller tracking experience.

Let's block commercials! (Why?)

//arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/05/a-story-of-two-interior-out-vr-headsets-the-400-oculus-rift-s-600-hp-reverb/
2019-05-11 13:00:00Z
52780291535732

Share this post