AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and RX 5700 Review TechSpot

It’s time for our Radeon RX 5700 XT and RX 5700 assessment. AMD's were given us on a hectic schedule having just examined the new 3rd-gen Ryzen components, we're now equipped to check out Navi before we pass again and overview the mainstream Ryzen 5 3600 CPU tomorrow, so plenty more hardware goodness to come.

AMD's modern-day Navi GPUs are built the use of TSMC's 7nm production method and due to this they're appreciably smaller than the preceding Radeon RX Vega 56 and 64 components. When compared to Vega 10, Navi packs 18% fewer transistors, but is nearly 50% smaller at 251mm2. Whereas Vega 64 featured 64 compute units and Vega 56, 56 compute devices, the RX 5700 gets best 36 and the 5700 XT gets 40. However, this is extremely of a meaningless comparison because the cores used within the Navi GPUs are very different to Vega's.

The peak unmarried precision overall performance of the 5700 XT is down 23% in comparison to Vega 64 -- this is a greater applicable metric for compute -- at the same time as the height pixel fill-fee has been expanded through 23%, and that’s what is going to make the 5700 XT a better gaming GPU.

AMD has also achieved away with HBM for the new parts and as a substitute they feature 8GB of GDDR6 reminiscence for a bandwidth of 448 GB/s using a 256-bit wide reminiscence bus. This is about the same peak bandwidth of the brand new competing GeForce RTX 2060 Super and 2070 Super portraits playing cards.

Initially the Radeon 5700 XT was set to fee $450, but at the final minute AMD dropped that via $50 making it a $400 part (see, the Super effect). Meanwhile the RX 5700 became decreased by using $30 in advance of launch taking it from $380 to $350. That's what a competitive GPU landscape seems like.

	Radeon RX 5700 XT	Radeon RX 5700	Radeon RX Vega 64	GeForce RTX 2070 Super	GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Price (MSRP)	$400	$350	$500	$500	$400
Architecture	RDNA 7nm TSMC	RDNA 7nm TSMC	GCN 5 14nm GF	Turing 12nm TSMC	Turing 12nm TSMC
Graphics core	2560 SP	2304 SP	4096 SP	2560 CUDA	2176 CUDA
Peak SP Compute	9.7 TFLOPs	7.9 TFLOPS	13.4 TFLOPs	9.1 TFLOPS	7.2 TLFOPS
Base clock	1605 MHz	1465 MHz	1247 MHz	1605 MHz	1470 MHz
Game clock	1755 MHz	1625 MHz	N/A	N/A	N/A
Boost clock	1905 MHz	1725 MHz	1546 MHz	1770 MHz	1650 MHz
Memory	8GB 256-bit GDDR6	8GB 256-bit GDDR6	8GB 2048-bit HBM2	8GB 256-bit GDDR6	8GB 256-bit GDDR6
Memory bandwidth	448 GBps	448 GBps	484 GBps	448 GBps	448 GBps
TDP	225 W	185 W	295 W	215 W	175 W

AMD is claiming a 225 W board energy rating for the 5700 XT and 185 W for the 5700, both decrease than Vega 10. As for clock speeds, those can be a touch misleading although at least AMD has specific a gaming clock. The boost clock is honestly meaningless as this frequency isn’t performed past the primary few seconds of gaming. So the gaming clock is a extra accurate metric and we commonly noticed clock speeds round 50 MHz better than what AMD claims, as a minimum in our 21 diploma test surroundings, though in greater adverse situations the fan speed ought to clearly ramp up to preserve clock speeds.

Navi also brings support for PCIe 4.0 which is first-rate on paper but for those particular GPUs it offers no tangible upgrades over the three.0 spec.

For testing we’ve used an Intel Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3400 reminiscence. The ultra-modern drivers available at the time of checking out were used and all this records is sparkling for this assessment and gathered inside the beyond two weeks. We have examined 12 video games earlier than our usual performance breakdowns and fee in line with frame facts.

Benchmarks

First up we've got Battlefield V and right away we've got some odd outcomes. The Radeon RX 5700 XT is very marvelous rendering 112 fps on common, but we also see an strangely low 1% performance. Whereas the 5700 XT is 11% quicker than the RTX 2070 Super for the average frame charge, it became simply 1% quicker for the 1% low end result. Gameplay changed into smooth and no stuttering changed into noticed however we're going to need to see if this is some thing AMD can clear up with a destiny motive force or now not.

We see the equal aspect with the same old 5700, even though it matched the common frame rate of the 2070 Super, the 1% low result was nicely below that of the 2060 Super. Overall performance in-recreation was excellent, and the better information is this was the handiest name in which we found this sort of 1% low performance.

Frame quotes in Rainbow Six Siege, as an example, had been very constant, even though here the RX 5700 XT fell brief of matching the RTX 2070 Super. It did deliver RTX 2070-like performance and became 5% slower than the Radeon VII.

The RX 5700 changed into ~9% at the back of the RTX 2060 Super, although we are hoping to look more favorable outcomes for AMD in the different games examined.

Now with Metro Exodus even though. The margins are pretty comparable in this sport, where the 5700 XT trailed the 2070 Super by means of an 11% margin, and the 5700 turned into 6% slower than the 2060 Super.

The Radeon VII changed into also 17% faster than the 5700 XT, even though of course it is a miles greater expensive product.

Moving on to Resident Evil 2, we see pretty aggressive outcomes. The 5700 XT became 5% slower than the RTX 2070 Super at the same time as the 5700 changed into 4% slower than the 2060 Super. Although Nvidia enjoys a performance gain, especially after their Super enhance, their graphics cards also value more, so it'll be interesting to peer how they all compare inside the cost consistent with body analysis on the end of this assessment.

Next up we've got Shadow of the Tomb Raider and right here the 5700 and 2060 Super are neck and neck. The 5700 XT didn’t do poorly, but it was 7% slower than the 2070 Super. It also expenses 20% much less.

Both new RX 5700 pics cards have been able to supply fantastically playable performance in Fortnite at 1440p the usage of the maximum image pleasant settings, but as we’ve said within the beyond this isn’t an excellent title for AMD when comparing performance with their GeForce competition. The 5700 XT handiest managed to suit the 2060 Super, which isn't always a awesome end result ordinary.

Moving on we find a miles stronger result for AMD in The Division 2. Granted they don’t disregard the GeForce competition, but even so the 5700 matched the 2060 Super even as the 5700 XT became just 7% slower than the 2070 Super.

DiRT sees a terrific result for the brand new RDNA GPUs. The 5700 suits the 2060 Super and the equal is proper while comparing the 5700 XT and 2070 Super. This is a exceptionally competitive end result for the new AMD GPUs.

We bet AMD wish every name became as type to them as Forza Horizon 4 is, what a shellacking. The popular 5700 without problems beats the 2070 Super, leaving the 2060 Super in the back of in a completely exceptional performance tier. Meanwhile the 5700 XT manages to conquer even the Radeon VII, spitting out an first rate 131 fps on average, basically putting it on par with the RTX 2080 Ti.

Although now not nearly as exquisite, the Far Cry New Dawn consequences are still favorable for AMD as each 5700 GPUs edged out or at the very least matched the GeForce competition. Given they each price a little less this is a strong result.

Another stellar end result for AMD may be seen in World War Z, where the 5700 and 5700 XT beat their nearest competitor. The 5700 XT even beat the RTX 2080. The trendy 5700 was 13% faster than the 2060 Super, although it did simplest simply manage to side our Vega 56.

The last game in trendy roundup is Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. The 5700 XT turned into 7% slower than the 2070 Super even as the 5700 changed into thirteen% slower than the 2060 Super. Not a brilliant end result but no longer too disappointing to cease on either.

So with the FPS overall performance within the bag for a dozen video games, allow’s pass on to test out strength intake.

Power Consumption

Our first graph looks at GPU power exclusively, so not the board power. Interestingly the 5700 XT consumed 6% much less power than the RTX 2070 Super and 25% much less than the Radeon VII. The trendy RX 5700 ate up 27% much less power than the XT model and that meant it turned into much greater green than even the RTX 2060, so a super end result for the base Navi version.

Now while searching at general device intake, we see some changes. Now the 5700 XT consumes barely greater strength than the 2070 Super that's thrilling, it’s not a big alternate however earlier than it ate up 6% much less power inside the GPU-only take a look at, now while measuring the complete board plus the machine, it consumed 2.5% more power. The 5700 is seen matching the same old 2060 while formerly it ate up rather less strength.

Temperature & Overclocking

Out of the field the Radeon RX 5700 XT runs at 84 ranges and maintains a core clock speed of 1740 MHz and a reminiscence velocity of 872 MHz which is essentially 14 Gbps. The blower fan typically spun at 2100 RPM in our checking out.

Overclocking the 5700 XT noticed the center peak at just over 1940 MHz however at times could nonetheless drop as low as 1720 MHz and on average we saw a clock pace of 1860 MHz, which is a ~10% overclock. The huge fluctuation become because of the almost 90 degree running temperature, at 88 ranges the GPU tends to throttle and with the fan walking at 43% or 2100 RPM, there has been room to transport. As for the memory, we have been only capable of get the GDDR6 up to a transfer pace of 14.3 Gbps, in order that was a piece disappointing.

With the core clock leaping everywhere in the vicinity we decided to crank the fan as much as 100% -- wherein it’s particularly noisy because it spun at 4600 RPM -- on this situation the GPU peaked at 70 tiers and the 5700 XT become able to preserve a middle clock pace of over 2 GHz always. That’s approximately a 20% overclock from inventory, I reckon liquid cooling goes to be a popular choice for those 5700 XT pics cards.

As for the standard 5700, out of the field it ran at 75 stages with a fan pace of 1900 RPM and maintained a typical working frequency of 1670 MHz. Then whilst overclocked with the auto fan speed it hit 85 levels, but the fan turned into only spinning at 1600 RPM. We can anticipate that is a computer virus with the early revision drivers.

For one closing take a look at, we cranked the fan speed up to 50% which saw the blower fan spin at 2700 RPM. It were given loud however not anything crazy or unbearable. This allowed the 5700 to average a core frequency of 1780 MHz at 70 levels. Unfortunately, we were unable to push the core any better as there appears to be a frequency cap in the mean time and it’s no longer clear if AMD will get rid of it.

Performance Breakdown

Radeon RX 5700 vs. GeForce RTX 2060 Super

First up we have the war between the RX 5700 and its major competitor, the RTX 2060 Super. From our 12 recreation pattern the Radeon turned into on average 1% quicker, but this is not practical as the big win in Forza Horizon 4 skewed the result. If we remove the Forza outlier, the RX 5700 is simply 2% slower on average. With that we are able to say it's near enough to name a tie and we normally do this when discussing margins beneath a 5% distinction.

We located aggressive overall performance in DiRT Rally 2, Far Cry New Dawn, The Division 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Resident Evil 2. So it is going to be interesting to see how those two stack up in terms of the cost according to body contrast.

Radeon RX 5700 vs. GeForce RTX 2070

When compared to the authentic RTX 2070 so that you can quickly leave the marketplace, the RX 5700 was 2% slower on average. Again it enjoyed that big Forza Horizon 4 end result, but nonetheless it pulled off strong wins in World War Z and Battlefield V.

Radeon RX 5700 vs. Radeon Vega 56

Against Vega 56, the brand new RX 5700 become 11% faster on common. Not a huge performance uplift after 2 years, but the 5700 is a significantly less complex GPU so AMD may be in a position to show a income selling it, even at $350, so there’s that.

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Next up we've got the 5700 XT and it additionally does nicely in its struggle with the RTX 2070 Super. It become simply 4% slower than the GeForce when we eliminated the Forza Horizon 4 result.

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. GeForce RTX 2080

The 5700 XT became additionally 9% slower than the a great deal greater costly RTX 2080, so you can see why Nvidia feels the want to introduce an RTX 2080 Super. At instances the Radeon GPU became up to 20 - 24% slower, however that also makes the 5700 XT a better price choice.

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. Radeon VII

Speaking of price, the 5700 XT, just like the 2070 Super, now not only gets rid of the usual 2080 however it additionally waves good-bye to the compute-heavy Radeon VII. The more recent Navi-based card is 6% slower, so we are hoping you didn’t currently drop around $700 on a Radeon VII.

Cost in line with Frame Comparison

First we have an MSRP comparison the use of launch prices. Compared to Vega 56’s $400 MSRP, the 5700 XT gives a large 21% discount consistent with frame, even as the usual RX 5700 provides a 22% discount, in order that’s first-rate.

It’s also a huge development over the Radeon VII and we only were given that 5 months in the past. At a price of $6.54 in step with frame the 5700 XT saves you nearly 40% as you are basically getting the equal performance for $300 off, however we received’t faux just like the Radeon VII or RTX 2080 had been ever particularly precise fee, so allow’s move directly to a assessment with the contemporary market fees.

Even right here the RX 5700 and 5700 XT look great at their adjusted MSRPs. Maybe AMD should have done with the unique fees announced a few weeks in the past, however clearly they wanted to move for an awesome cost and try and disrupt the otherwise GeForce-ruled market. The new Navi GPUs are greater value effective than the 2060 Super, fashionable 2060 and GTX 1660 Ti.

The RX 5700 comes in at a as a substitute large 14% bargain consistent with frame while compared to the RTX 2060 Super, and the RX 5700 XT is eighteen% below consistent with body as compared to the 2070 Super. So that's actually really precise.

Closing Thoughts

When we tested the brand new GeForce Super portraits cards ultimate week, we mentioned the obvious. That become Nvidia's try to scouse borrow AMD’s thunder as Navi changed into approximately to launch the week after. The RTX 2070 Super is a stable addition no matter what camp you're on, killing off the Radeon VII, RTX 2070 or even the RTX 2080. The 2060 Super wasn't as interesting as it essentially slotted into the existing pricing structure.

Forcing AMD’s hand to an extent, the company moved to cut pricing which has sparked in addition hobby on what these Navi GPUs can deliver. In phrases of performance the RX 5700 can basically healthy the RTX 2060 Super, which till a week ago became RTX 2070-like overall performance -- making it barely faster than Vega 64. For $350, this is pretty good fee.

Then we have the RX 5700 XT which unearths itself in a sweet spot at $400, popping out at a fee of simply $4.00 in line with frame in our trying out, it is a better cost than less expensive merchandise including the unique RTX 2060 and the GTX 1660 Ti. Not to say you’re getting near 2070 Super performance at a instead hefty cut price.

Availability could be key, if AMD is capable of inventory shelves with $400 5700 XT’s and $350 5700’s, then they may provide the quality fee at these rate factors. We're being advised custom AIB fashions are at the way, too, and if they are able to enhance out of the container overall performance a bit, whilst bringing approximately the everyday AIB card benefits, then Nvidia might be compelled into making a few adjustments of their very own and at that point we’ll have a good old fashioned GPU pricing warfare on our hands.

The reference model playing cards we examined have been rather quiet and nothing just like the Radeon VII. The enthusiasts on the 5700 XT simplest spun up to 2100 RPM after an hour-long strain test and while the GPU was sitting at a touch over 80 tiers, that’s good enough considering the blower style cooler that is not precisely ideal. The setup is usable and also you truly received’t require the usage of earmuffs, once more, we're looking at you Radeon VII.

Bottom line, we adore what we see from AMD as they're subsequently competitive on the mainstream photos level, now not simply in phrases of charge and sheer overall performance, but performance as properly. At the equal time, the brand new Radeons are catching as much as Nvidia's offerings which have been out for approximately a 12 months -- sans-ray tracing which isn't very usable on this era -- however at better normal fee and fee factors. We wish some weeks from now inventory levels are properly and pricing is at or very close to the MSRP.

Watch out for upcoming articles as we observe Radeon Image Sharpening (think DLSS from AMD) and similarly analysis on both CPU and GPU facets.

Shopping Shortcuts:

Let's block commercials! (Why?)

//www.techspot.com/review/1870-amd-radeon-rx-5700/
2019-07-08 11:05:00Z
52780327749348