Galaxy Fit vs. Galaxy Watch Active vs. Fitbit Inspire HR CNET

Samsung Galaxy Fit: a bit Fitbit, a chunk Nike.

Sarah Tew/CNET

The Samsung Galaxy Fit has finally arrived nowadays, after being announced lower back at Samsung's Galaxy S10 occasion. I've been wearing the $99 tracker on my wrist for a bit over 24 hours. How does it evaluate to affordable Fitbits, or to Samsung's other new fitness watch, the Galaxy Watch Active? It feels, in a number of approaches, find it irresistible falls right in among.

The Galaxy Fit feels extra like a light-weight, finances fitness tracker than the round, better-layout Galaxy Watch. It's an evolution of Samsung's longer-display bands going lower back to Gear Fit. Despite its decrease-key look, it has some spectacular specs: it is 5ATM water-resistant, has onboard heart rate (and Samsung's "strain stage" monitoring, which appears a bit unreliable/perplexing), computerized sleep tracking, computerized pastime workout monitoring (for on foot, jogging, cycling, rowing, elliptical) plus smartphone notifications.

Now gambling: Watch this: Samsung Galaxy Watch Active, Galaxy Buds and Galaxy Fit:...

6:30

Galaxy Fit vs. Fitbit Inspire HR

The closest parallel in Fitbit-land is the Fitbit Inspire HR, which also expenses $99. The Inspire HR also has water resistance for swimming, sleep monitoring, coronary heart fee, and notifications. It has a black and white display screen as opposed to a color display. Otherwise, it is quite comparable.

The Galaxy Fit band is skinny, seems like firm rubber, and has proprietary connections. It felt at ease on my wrist and attached firmly, however perhaps it became a bit too slender. The blanketed (proprietary) charger magnetically attaches to the back of the Fit.

It's not continually clean to look the text.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Navigation on the Galaxy Fit occurs thru touching and swiping: it really works first-rate, however it is now not continually clean to do while moving (the text is small). A facet button goes lower back to the principle watch display, or quick begins a exercise while pressed and held: that is my favourite factor it does that, weirdly, the Fitbit Inspire HR does not.

I also like Samsung fitness devices' computerized tracking of walks and workout routines, and how the stats right away seem onscreen. On a brisk stroll, I'm unexpectedly in exercise monitoring mode with out doing anything.

Loading a restricted set of 5 customizable watch faces is pretty clean, even on iOS, via an eye fixed face gallery that appears like what the Apple Watch has. Steps, heart charge, climate and some other stats can seem at the watch faces, however you cannot cycle thru them or see more than a pair right away, that is annoying. Also, only watch face can be at the Galaxy Fit at a time. Watch faces are quicker loading from the cellphone than Fitbit Inspire HR, however Fitbit's loads higher with including greater stat get right of entry to.

Much like Fitbit Inspire HR, you can swipe to peer a short dashboard of daily stats: heart rate (and resting heart charge), steps, energy burned. There's no stair hiking feature, even though.

Galaxy Fit vs. Galaxy Watch Active

The Galaxy Fit would not have tune garage or playback, any mobile bills, GPS, dedicated swim tracking, or integration with third-celebration health apps just like the Galaxy Watch Active has. That's where the Fit will become a unusual choice. The Galaxy Watch Active is certainly, in reality suitable, and would not fee all that a lot ($two hundred). Spending an additional hundred isn't always absurd in any respect.

The Fit feels quite basic as compared to the Watch Active, which is my largest concern with it. Battery life is meant to last as long as every week (as opposed to about 4-5 days on Inspire HR). I have not worn it long enough to understand what the actual battery existence is.

Swapping the (limited) watch faces is simple, even on an iPhone.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Should you buy it?

If you are finances conscious, and need that smaller band layout, and prefer Samsung hardware, the Galaxy Fit can be a good desire. But I nevertheless assume the Fitbit Inspire HR hooks into a miles higher social fitness surroundings with Fitbit, that is why you'd be best off with that instead. (If you are a massive Samsung S-Health fan, the Gear Fit may be something you'd select.)

Samsung's biggest advantage tends to be unique hardware functions, and people are mostly on the Watch Active. More to are available a complete review.

Let's block advertisements! (Why?)

//www.cnet.com/news/galaxy-match-vs-galaxy-watch-lively-vs-fitbit-encourage-hr/
2019-06-14 04:36:00Z
52780314223532

Share this post